Showing posts with label Las Vegas Review-Journal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Las Vegas Review-Journal. Show all posts

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Las Vegas Review-Journal: Disputed fight spurs less fact than fiction

By Ed Graney

Bob Arum has called for an investigation by the attorney general, and Sen. Harry Reid is endorsing such a move, and the WBO has said it will launch a review, and Timothy Bradley has ice on his ankles, and Manny Pacquiao is probably home in the Philippines handing out money to strangers who wander by his house.
The saga that was the most-ridiculous-split-decision-in-recent-memory plays on, with majority opinions about those who judged it remaining strong in this sense: They got it wrong.

The names Jerry Roth and Duane Ford and CJ Ross have been front and center since Saturday evening, when Bradley was handed a win he didn't earn in a welterweight title fight against Pacquiao at the MGM Grand Garden.

The three scores of 115-113 - Roth was the one who sided with Pacquiao - have created more questions than answers, affording us a wonderful opportunity to play another version of a wildly popular game.

 Fact or Fiction.

Claim: Any investigation into the scoring will prove futile, and Pacquiao will follow through with his rematch against Bradley in November.

Fact.

I don't believe the fight was fixed. I don't believe anyone was on the take.

I believe the three assigned to judge it had forgettable nights at the office and will be surprised to see any of them scoring another major title fight here anytime soon.

Arum is a promoter whose leading fighters also have been handed favorable decisions over the years, with an argument being made for Pacquiao as recently as November against Juan Manuel Marquez.

Time will pass. Negotiations will begin. More millions will be made on the rematch for all parties.

As for Reid, perhaps he should worry about something a tad more serious than Pacquiao-Bradley. Like, well, the more than 400 pink slips being handed teachers across the valley.

Claim: Judges such as Ford (74) and Roth (71) are too old to continue scoring such major fights.

Fiction.

It's not a function of age. It's one of accountability. Judges need more clinics, more film study, more seminars to keep their skills sharp. Nevada Athletic Commission executive director Keith Kizer should be the one ensuring this happens. How can you claim to regulate your sport when you don't consistently regulate those who judge it?

Kizer didn't return a message left on his phone Monday, which I have to believe was due to the fact he was busy explaining to others how those he chose to judge the fight erred in such a blatant regard.

Highly competent judges have made sound scoring decisions into their 80s. Some in their 40s wouldn't know a 10-count from a body punch.

The education of judges never should end, and if Kizer and his commissioners think they're doing enough in this regard, then they all were taking turns on Pacquiao's treadmill Saturday and not watching the fight.

Claim: Ross wasn't experienced enough to judge a fight the level of Pacquiao-Bradley.

Fiction.

You can't judge a second megafight until you score your first one. Every official in the NBA, every umpire in the major leagues, every referee in the NFL has to make his maiden voyage into the big time at some point. Ross has scored fights since 1992 and was a judge on the Canelo Alvarez-Shane Mosley bout here in May.
At some point, she was going to get this shot.

And to those in the Top Rank camp, who since Saturday have questioned Ross' viability and resume to judge the fight: Why, then, didn't your representative stand up and speak out against her when given the opportunity at a commission meeting that made official the three judges for Pacquiao-Bradley? Why did you remain silent if you had such concerns about her experience?

Claim: Boxing should be more transparent in its approach and begin showing scorecards at the end of each round.

Fiction.

Nice idea, in theory. In reality, a disaster.

Who's to say a fighter leading 4-1 after five rounds and who gets cut doesn't have an unscrupulous cornerman who makes that cut a tad deeper, claims his guy can't continue and the fight goes to the scoring cards? Who's to say someone trailing 8-0 in rounds doesn't quit?

Open scoring would do far more harm than good.

Claim: When told of the fight's outcome in his cell at the Clark County Detention Center, Floyd Mayweather Jr. cracked a large smile, somehow pulled himself off his cot in such an emaciated state that two weeks in jail reportedly has left him, threw caution to the wind and took a big gulp of tap water.

Fact.

Well, at least the part about smiling.

Las Vegas Review-Journal sports columnist Ed Graney can be reached at egraney@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-4618. He can be heard from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. Monday through Friday on "Gridlock," ESPN 1100 and 98.9 FM. Follow him on Twitter: @edgraney.

wbo committee to review disputed judges' decision
 
One of boxing's major sanctioning bodies will review Timothy Bradley's controversial split decision over Manny Pacquiao, the first step toward what promoter Bob Arum hopes will be "clarity" in the judging of the fight.

WBO president Francisco "Paco" Valcarcel said in a statement Wednesday that the WBO's championship committee will review video of the fight with five "recognized international judges" and make a recommendation. He said the WBO does not doubt the ability of the scoring judges.

Most reporters seated ringside and the vast majority of fans inside the MGM Grand Garden on Saturday night thought Pacquiao had easily retained his welterweight title against Bradley.

The first surprise came when ring announcer Michael Buffer announced that there was a split decision, and the biggest surprise came in the reading of the judges' scores. Jerry Roth had it 115-113 for Pacquiao, while Duane Ford and CJ Ross had it for Bradley by the same score.

The Associated Press scored the fight 117-111 for Pacquiao.

"The public saw the fight, and they're outraged, and we need clarity here," Arum said Wednesday. "We need those responsible to investigate, to see what happened, how the judges could be so off.

"Was there any funny business going on? Or no funny business? Did they have a conversation with e
ach other? We need to get clarity. The public is demanding it."

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

LVR-J:Reid endorses call for probe into disputed Bradley-Pacquiao fight

By Steve Tetreault
STEPHENS WASHINGTON BUREAU
Posted: Jun. 12, 2012 | 12:20 p.m.

WASHINGTON - Sen. Harry Reid on Tuesday endorsed calls for a state investigation into the outcome of Saturday's disputed WBO welterweight title fight between Manny Pacquiao and Timothy Bradley at the MGM Grand Garden.

Reid, D-Nev., said it would be helpful for such a probe to "clear the air" surrounding the controversial split decision that favored Bradley but led many to believe Pacquiao was robbed of his belt.

Infuriated fight promoter Bob Arum has sent a letter asking state Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto to look into the scoring by judges Duane Ford and CJ Ross, who each had Bradley winning. A third judge, Jerry Roth, gave the fight to Pacquiao.

"I feel confident there has been nothing untoward, but if an investigation makes everyone feel better, do the investigation," Reid, the Senate majority leader, told reporters when asked about the fight at his weekly news gathering.

A former boxer and a former member of the Nevada Athletic Commission who has judged fights, Reid usually is a fixture at major fights in Las Vegas. He said he did not go to this one because it was his wife's birthday and he flew back to Washington.

But there has been no escaping the outcry over the fight that might enter boxing lore.

"From all the reports I've seen by people on the outside who saw the fight, who attempted to be fair and judge the fight, Pacquiao won the fight," Reid said. "Now, I understand how upset everybody is."
Reid also has personal connections to some of the players. He long has been friends with Arum, the Las Vegas-based chairman of Top Rank Boxing.

And Pacquiao, a hugely popular boxer, endorsed Reid in 2010, appearing at a frenzied Las Vegas rally a few days before the embattled incumbent won re-election. Reid returned the favor by hosting Pacquiao and his wife when they traveled to Washington last year.

Reid said Tuesday that Pacquiao managed the weekend loss "better than anyone else. He said, 'It's a fight, and I lost. We'll fight again.' "

Ford and Ross have said they stand by their scoring, which each favored Bradley by a score of 115-113. Roth had the fight 115-113 for Pacquiao.

Reid said he thought it was worth the time for Cortez Masto to take a look.

"Remember, this fight involved hundreds of millions of dollars," Reid said. "As I said, I am confident there was nothing untoward. I think people just make bad decisions in a lot of things they do, including judging fights. But it doesn't hurt to clear the air and take a look at this."

"These things happen," Reid said, noting Las Vegas is where Mike Tyson bit off a piece of Evander Holyfield's ear at the Grand Garden in 1997 and where a paraglider landed in the ring during the 1993 fight at Caesars Palace between Holyfield and Riddick Bowe.

"This is a bad decision, but bad decisions have happened in fighting forever," Reid said of Saturday's result. "So I hope there is nothing untoward on this, and that's why I think the attorney general looking into it doesn't bother me at all."

Reid said the controversy also might fuel the revival of federal legislation to regulate boxing, an effort he has pushed periodically along with Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

"Maybe this will be the impetus for Senator McCain and I to get back to work on it again," he said.

Contact Stephens Washington bureau chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760. Follow him on Twitter: @STetreaultDC.